Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
Garner states that deadly force “may not be used unless necessary to prevent (an) escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.”

And how did Walter Scott pose a significant threat of death or injury to anyone?

428 posted on 04/12/2015 4:27:59 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

Maybe the officer figured if the guy attacked him and could possibly have still had the taser in his posession, Scott could have attacked someone else?? The only way to know what the officer’s reasoning was is to ask him. Only a jury that hears every piece of evidence can resolve this. Lets hope when the verdict comes people will respect it.


452 posted on 04/12/2015 4:45:49 PM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Just curious, in your opinion if a subject fights you and succeeds in getting your taser from you, should you deem him a threat in the future as he is fleeing?


497 posted on 04/12/2015 5:44:46 PM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson