“The powers that be in Charleston might have charged him, in an attempt to forestall a similar situation.”
Looks worded pretty clearly to me.
Why would they charge him with murder if they have no evidence?
I’m sure the folks at the Tree House can answer your questions, why don’t you ask them?
It will save you having to be so repetitive here...
I remember, years ago, overhearing a father fed up with his young son while I was shopping in the supermarket.
He said, in disgust. “you have a head like concrete, all mixed up and permantly set”.
No matter how many words I use to qualify my remarks, you don’t seem able to comprehend the difference between speculation and conclusion.
What part of “might” don’t you understand as speculation?
Heavens, they would NEVER do such a thing! As we know from the Zimmerman case....um, wait