Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Drango
I'm not making this up. If a person suspected of assaulting another person (or committing some violent crime), yes, by the standards set by the Supreme Court, that fleeing person/suspect can be shot by the police.

Read the rest of my comments. I said what happened does not necessarily exonerate the cop. But he was assaulted by Mr. Scott. If I assault a cop then flee, I have a reasonable expectation that the cop might shoot me. What do you think a cop might do after you've assaulted him? Blow kisses at you. Use your head.

155 posted on 04/12/2015 6:43:33 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: driftless2

Either you haven’t read Tenn v Garner, or didn’t understand it. The SCOTUS voided the preexisting common law “fleeing felon” doctrine, and said the fleeing person must still pose an imminent threat for deadly force to be justified in apprehending them. The real issue here is Slaver’s state of mind and factors contributing to whether he actually believed Scott to be a continued imminent threat.


185 posted on 04/12/2015 7:04:58 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson