Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stanford team develops super-fast charging aluminium battery. (7000+ cycles without capacity decay.)
The Royal Society of Chemistry ^ | April 7, 2015 | Tim Wogan

Posted on 04/11/2015 6:43:06 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Other comments on this breakthrough:

"We have developed a rechargeable aluminum battery that may replace existing storage devices, such as alkaline batteries, which are bad for the environment, and lithium-ion batteries, which occasionally burst into flames," said Hongjie Dai, a professor of chemistry at Stanford. "Our new battery won't catch fire, even if you drill through it."

Durability is another important factor. Aluminum batteries developed at other laboratories usually died after just 100 charge-discharge cycles. But the Stanford battery was able to withstand more than 7,500 cycles without any loss of capacity. "This was the first time an ultra-fast aluminum-ion battery was constructed with stability over thousands of cycles," the authors wrote.

"Our battery produces about half the voltage of a typical lithium battery," he said. "But improving the cathode material could eventually increase the voltage and energy density. Otherwise, our battery has everything else you'd dream that a battery should have: inexpensive electrodes, good safety, high-speed charging, flexibility and long cycle life. I see this as a new battery in its early days. It's quite exciting."

Other co-lead authors of the study affiliated with Stanford are visiting scientists Mengchang Lin from the Taiwan Industrial Technology Research Institute, Bingan Lu from Hunan University, and postdoctoral scholar Yingpeng Wu. Other authors are Di-Yan Wang, Mingyun Guan, Michael Angell, Changxin Chen and Jiang Yang from Stanford; and Bing-Joe Hwang from National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.

Principal support for the research was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, the Taiwan Industrial Technology Research Institute, the Stanford Global Climate and Energy Project, the Stanford Precourt Institute for Energy and the Taiwan Ministry of Education.

1 posted on 04/11/2015 6:43:06 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76; SunkenCiv

Well, let’s hope it works.


2 posted on 04/11/2015 6:46:22 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Sounds good. Lithium batteries are already a way better than Ni-Cads. Unfortunately they are also more expensive.


3 posted on 04/11/2015 6:49:47 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Cool! Let’s see how long it takes for the Chinese to put it in production.


4 posted on 04/11/2015 6:54:40 PM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Diagonally parked in a parallel universe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Cue the luddites who are convinced anything that extends battery life is a commie plot and nothing will ever replace gasoline powered cars.


5 posted on 04/11/2015 6:55:11 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Kool, a beer can and campfire battery.


6 posted on 04/11/2015 6:57:25 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

All the new battery technologies seem to have other problems, one is that high charge rates almost always imply high self-discharge rates. Also, you would have to plug in a nuclear power plant if you think you are going to charge a car battery of decent capacity as quickly as you fill a tank with gas (ok, an exaggeration, but still you would have to actually be at a substation to do this.

However, this is definitely worth a look - even if they are big and bulky and weigh a lot, they might make a nice compliment to stationary solar power, for example. Solar panels last 20 years or so. 7000 charge/discharges = about 20 years of day/night, for example, and the high self-discharge rates might not matter in relatively sunny areas. Aluminum is plentiful and not hard to recycle, also.


7 posted on 04/11/2015 6:59:46 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Okay, but who is this Al U. Minium guy? ;’) thanks RACPE.


8 posted on 04/11/2015 7:00:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie
here's the wow factor of their claims

Perhaps most remarkably, the battery can safely be completely recharged in less than 60 seconds.


9 posted on 04/11/2015 7:02:44 PM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Eddie Mush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

According to the Royal Society article, the Stanford team developed a working prototype battery, and “commercial companies are interested.” Is “interested” the right word? Some of them might be shell shocked. In November 2014, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway paid $4.7 billion to P&G in a stock transaction for cash-cow Duracell.


10 posted on 04/11/2015 7:03:49 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76 (Term limits. Repeal the 16th and 17th amendments. Sunset bureaucracies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

I will adopt a wait-and-see strategy. If it ever happens, fine. Being a skeptic does not make me a Luddite.


11 posted on 04/11/2015 7:06:30 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ever the person who jumps to conclusions. Geez. Keep in mind this article is from the Royal Society of Chemists. That would be in London, England, wouldn’t it? In England, they spell aluminum as aluminium.


12 posted on 04/11/2015 7:08:07 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76 (Term limits. Repeal the 16th and 17th amendments. Sunset bureaucracies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Ever the mouthy insulting snarky troll, you need to buy yourself a sense of humor.


13 posted on 04/11/2015 7:13:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

This does sound like a possible game-changer for the near-future.


14 posted on 04/11/2015 7:14:41 PM PDT by GeronL (CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Just humbly offering you a dose of your own medicine.


15 posted on 04/11/2015 7:15:39 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76 (Term limits. Repeal the 16th and 17th amendments. Sunset bureaucracies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

See, if you were as clever as you make yourself out to be, you would have spelled it “humour.” lol


16 posted on 04/11/2015 7:17:20 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76 (Term limits. Repeal the 16th and 17th amendments. Sunset bureaucracies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Ever the mouthy insulting snarky troll, you need to buy yourself a sense of humor.

I'm inclined to agree that this sulphurous back-and-forth is unhealthy.

17 posted on 04/11/2015 7:18:00 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

What does it all mean?


18 posted on 04/11/2015 7:20:55 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
Perhaps most remarkably, the battery can safely be completely recharged in less than 60 seconds.

I don't recall seeing how fast it discharges. If it lasts twice as long as it takes to charge, you'd need to keep the 'battery powered' device plugged in.

19 posted on 04/11/2015 7:22:29 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

He’s got a relative Stateside. His name is also Al. Al.U.Minum. When he crossed the Atlantic, he was offered $200 for a vowel. Being broke, he sold it to Pat and Vanna.


20 posted on 04/11/2015 7:25:08 PM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind, but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson