Looking how you keep posting to yourself you seem a bit of attention seeker here. But I’ll take the bait.
You’re graphic isn’t funny, but even if it were your target is a 77 year old man who hasn’t participated in government or politics or elections since 2000. He has no say or sway in anything. He is all but retired. Perhaps you might find someone actually involved and at least partially responsible for current predicaments to make a caption about?
I find your handle comical given the target of your poorly captioned picture, dishing on a man who was the FRIGGIN communications director for Ronaldus Magnus himself, PJB actually WAS a Reaganite Republican.
Finally, you dish on a man who in three tremendous volumes starting 17 years ago laid out the case to prevent the absurd destruction of our great America, despite Reagan’s restoration, right before our eyes. The Great Betrayal, A Republic Not an Empire and Death of the West were the warnings of the complete decline of our beautiful, wonderful, amazing country and no one would listen. We’d still be an economic colossus, we’d still hold our place as the globe’s heavyweight champion, we wouldn’t have to worry about our demographic balance vanishing without ever even getting to vote on it. No one would give a rat’s behind about what anyone in Iran said about anything.
The truth is we can’t really do anything about what Iran does, not right now anyway. We probably don’t have the economic power to fight for real, certainly we don’t have the Patriotism of the populace required to do so, we’ve shipped our economy overseas, borrowed operating expenses from China, hitch rides to the space station from Russia (!), 1/3 of adults don’t even work (yeah, you’ll get them to fight) and kids can’t even wear American Flag tee shirts to school anymore.
Maybe you can do Pete DuPont wearing Depends next?
I agree with most of his domestic observations, and have read Buchanan’s books
Used to enjoy him greatly on McLaughlin FOR YEARS...
but what Pat Buchanan said on Fox yesterday borders on lunacy
Because he worked for Reagan I have to like Buchanan’s 2015 isolationist foreign policy ‘ideas’- or there’s something wrong with me?
He’s the one who’s way off the track... why don’t you stick to the points noted above, I never said a peep about Pat Buchanan’s domestic views- ever.
btw, Did you hear Pat’s defense of the Charlie Hedbo terrorists on McLaughlin Report?
All he had to say is ‘they were provoked’, because we ‘slandered the prophet’- he sounds like he doesn’t believe in any of the things I do (and I’m Catholic too)
And his excuse-making for V. Putin is appalling- doesn’t sound like he remembers what it even means to be a Reaganite, certainly on foreign policy
I have yet to hear a good rebuttal from the neoconservatives of the following point that Pat Buchanan makes: if Nixon can sit down and negotiate with a monster like Chairman Mao (who had the death of millions on his hands, and, indirectly in Vietnam, the death of tens of thousands of Americans) and Reagan can negotatiate with leaders of what he rightly called the Evil Empire, what is intrinsically treasonous about negotiating with Iran? How is Iran so much more dangerous than Communist China or the USSR, and are we really supposed to believe that Mao Tse Tung was somehow so much more reasonable and friendly towards us than Hassan Rouhani?
That just about covers it. I’ve never understood the Buchanan hatred among conservatives. William F. Buckley once wrote that Buchanan is more of a prophet than a politician, and if the country is to be saved, it will be along the lines laid down by Buchanan.
David Gergan used to work for Reagan too. Information Director I believe. Don’t think much of him today. They all seem to go whacky in their old age.
bookmark