Skip to comments.
Online poll: Do you support the Indiana bill allowing business owners to reject LGBT customers?
Fox 59 ^
| 3/31/2015
| Fox 59
Posted on 03/31/2015 8:51:54 AM PDT by sickoflibs
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: sickoflibs
Of course, the law does no such thing, so the question is faulty.
41
posted on
03/31/2015 9:56:55 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(You're either in or in the way.)
To: sickoflibs
You have to answer about 600 questions before you will ever get to the one about Indiana. Most people won’t bother.
42
posted on
03/31/2015 9:59:24 AM PDT
by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: sickoflibs
Morality ain’t determined by majority vote. God has already condemned and damned unrepentant homosexuals to hell and the lake of fire, where He’ll mercilessly torture them for all eternity. And those who “bandwagon” in favor of that disgusting behavior are just as damned.
43
posted on
03/31/2015 10:02:08 AM PDT
by
afsnco
To: sickoflibs
Thanks. I guess it would prevent someone from asking a Jewish deli to provide ham sandwiches at his gay wedding.
44
posted on
03/31/2015 10:30:37 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
To: sickoflibs
The question is asked in a way to distort the response. Should ask. Should Christian business owners be forced to violate their conscience and endorse immoral behavior?
To: Zhang Fei
RE:”
Thanks. I guess it would prevent someone from asking a Jewish deli to provide ham sandwiches at his gay wedding.” Well if the Jewish deli doesn't serve ham sandwiches to anyone then they don't have to serve them to gays under anti-discrimination laws.
Now the gay wedding part could get them into trouble under these laws
Indiana should have passed a law that specifically applies to objection to ceremonies,then the debate would have been much clearer.
46
posted on
03/31/2015 10:57:26 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: sickoflibs
47
posted on
03/31/2015 11:05:54 AM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: bird4four4
I want to see a clan rally hire a black family to cater their gathering.Our Clan wouldn't think twice about it, if they were the best available at the preferred price. That other Klan, on the other hand...
48
posted on
03/31/2015 2:17:24 PM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: ifinnegan
IMHO, the big reason that "gay marriage" proponents have been as successful as they have been is that they have baited many conservatives into treating marriage as a "religious issue", thus allowing leftists to paint those who don't acknowledge it as "foisting their religion on others". The proper rebuttal would be to suggest that any two (or more) individuals who want to consider themselves "married" are free to do so, but that does obligate anyone else to recognize them as such. It is common for people, including business owners, to voluntarily extend certain benefits and privileges to some people that they do not wish to extend to others. In a free country, such behavior is their right as individuals.
To declare by fiat that X is required to provide a service to Y which X has not voluntarily agreed to provide and does not wish to, is to make X a slave of either Y or the entity that is mandating such service. The issue isn't merely one of religion. It's about whether people should be compelled to serve others against their will.
49
posted on
03/31/2015 4:27:38 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Renounce Covetousness.)
To: supercat
I am in agreement with the direction of your argument.
Endless talk about minutiae related to homosexuality is pointless and a losing proposition.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson