Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

CDS (Cruz Derangement Syndrome) sufferers arriving to declare he’s not eligible in 3...2...1


14 posted on 03/21/2015 7:33:05 AM PDT by COBOL2Java ("God save America" - we are at the dawn of a new dark age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: COBOL2Java
CDS (Cruz Derangement Syndrome) sufferers arriving to declare he’s not eligible in 3...2...1

Yup!

They'll be here soon with their whining cries of "But he's not eligible!"
18 posted on 03/21/2015 7:36:07 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java
CDS (Cruz Derangement Syndrome) sufferers arriving to declare he’s not eligible in 3...2...1

I'll take that — but I actually like Mr. Cruz, while I don't believe him to be eligible for President I think he'd be excellent as AG or possibly USSC Justice.*

We Know that Mr. Cruz was born in Canada and that, at the time, his father was a citizen of Cuba. The first is important because it eliminates the anchor-baby problems** and because it then forces most of those asserting his eligibility to resort to statutes to support their claim, this destroys their claim though: Art I, Sec 8, Cl 4 clearly gives congress the power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, nowhere else in the constitution is there anything touching on legislation for any type of citizenship, and Src 1 of Amd 14 does not grant congress additional powers. So, by appealing to a statute to assert Mr. Cruz's eligibility one is in fact asserting that he is a naturalized citizen and therefore not eligible.

I didn't give Obama a free pass on his credentials, and I'm not about to because our guy is in a similar situation*** — we must respect the Constitution even, especially, when doing so would be inconvenient, else it means nothing, restraining only when we wish to be restrained.

* — Though there are arguments that there's more than enough lawyers on the USSC and it could do with some mathematician-/engineer-types who hold the Constitution in highest regard.
** — This arises from the USSC declaring that mere accident of the location of birth is enough to confer citizenship, I believe this from a mutilation of the 14th Amendment. (There's probably legislation in-play here too, given how long that opinion has been held by the political elite.)
*** — If Obama was born in HI, then he has that much above Cruz; if not, then the situations are very, very similar.

53 posted on 03/21/2015 8:16:06 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

He's not eligible; neither was Obama; does that matter now? Sure, I'm a birther, and proud of it because "the Constitution matters". I'd prefer all citizens honor the Constitution. But that's not happening. And because it's not happening we need a "revolution", and preferably a bloodless one, to restore Constitutional authority. Cruz is a revolutionary. General George Washington was a British subject and even fought with the British military. During the time of his revolution, he fought for our freedom. Washington would not turn his back on a good man like Cruz fighting for us during our time of revolution. Neither will I. He may not be eligible, but if Cruz is willing to fight for our freedom, I'll honor him with my support.


59 posted on 03/21/2015 8:41:16 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson