Ferguson Cop-Shooter Jeff Williams is Michael Brown Supporter, Said Murder was “Easy”

Pundit Press ^ | 3/15/15 | Aurelius

[rightistight]

Jeff Williams, who shot two Ferguson police officers, posted on Facebook about how “f*ked up” the actions of Darren Wilson were the day he shot and killed Michael Brown.

Despite this, protest leaders in Ferguson are distancing themselves from Williams, saying he was not a protester. Williams’s posts on social media show that to be a lie.

On a post dated January 15, Williams posted an extremely inaccurate video that he believed was an accurate representation of what happened between Michael Brown and Darren Wilson. The video showed Wilson attacking Brown, strangling him, and then shooting the teen while he had his hands up and was on his knees.

The video then shows the Ferguson police station’s version of events, as if it was their word against witnesses. In fact, Wilson’s version of events were corroborated by witnesses and forensic evidence.

Despite this, Williams wrote “f*ked up” on top of his post:

In an earlier post, dated January 2nd, Williams said that it was "easy" to take a life:

[UCANSEE2]

What I want to know is why it doesn’t have a problem with ‘smertfoan’, but does with ‘song’ ?

[Darksheare]

It let me add smertfoan to the onboard dictionary.
But for whatever reason it kept changing “song”.
The other day it changed “ either” to “wither”.

[AnAmericanMother]

Well, since my job involves reading autopsy reports on a fairly regular basis, I have a pretty good idea what various calibers will do to the human body.

"Strike power" is not a valid ballistic term. There have been some excellent recent articles exploding the "strike power" or "knockdown power" myth of the .45 ACP. As long ago as the 1940s, Fairbairn and Sykes were debunking the supposed knockdown capacities of the .455 Webley - they tell a story about a Sikh policeman in Singapore who attempted to apprehend a malefactor, emptied the Webley at him, hit him 3 times and he kept on running, he wound up fracturing his skull with the butt of the pistol (finally! a practical use for a Webley!)

Not saying I would stand and take a shot from a .455, .45, OR a .40 (I was shot once with a .22 short by an idiot kid. Didn't penetrate. I am sure a Stinger would be a different story, but thankfully they had not yet been invented.) But the .40 S&W is essentially a cut-down and downloaded 10mm for people who can't handle the recoil of the 10.

What I DON'T want to be shot with is a 5.56/.223. That will flat tear somebody up.

[AnAmericanMother]

Oh, it's not a toy by any means, even though I've been shot with one (.22 short) and walked away without a scratch. More people have been killed by .22 LR than any other caliber.

But Mossad uses it in a close-up assassination context, not shooting at a distance, at night.

In any event, the medical records will quickly show whether this was a .22 or a .40 S&W. Any big city coroner is very familiar with the difference.

[AnAmericanMother]

Both wounds were through and through - very little chance of finding the projectiles.

The wounds will tell the story though.

[Georgia Girl 2]

I thought one cop got a glancing blow to the head. How can that be a through and through?

[AnAmericanMother]

"Through and through" simply means that you have an entry and an exit wound, thus no projectile. Entered at the cheekbone and traveled under the skin, exiting at the ear. An indirect or glancing blow vis a vis the head - in other words not a penetrating wound that breached the skull.

Exactly what you'd expect from an almost-spent pistol round - deflected by bone.

[Georgia Girl 2]

I would theorize that this type of wound is more like a .22 not a .40 which even at a reduced speed would expend all its energy (unless its an FMJ) and basically still probably blow the head up. I guess we will see when the ballistic tests come back.