Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

But if you want to colonize a dead world, colonize the moon. It’s much more feasible. It’s sheer fantasy to think that Mars is more hospitable than the moon. It’s not.


10 posted on 03/06/2015 4:37:14 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman

Planets attract catastrophic impacts, impede interplanetary travel, and ultimately will doom the inhabitants. Asteroids, however, provide greater overall habitable space while minimizing the risks of catastrophic impacts for the whole of the populace. The asteroids can be moved to safety as the Sun enters its destructive giant stage. Mars is destined to continue to lose its atmosphere, even if it were to be Terraformed.


11 posted on 03/06/2015 4:56:57 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: samtheman

Seems to me those incredible telescopes would
be better served by being placed on the moon.
It is our next stop, why not go there? Live there?
I guess I’m just a product of the 60s.


13 posted on 03/06/2015 6:28:24 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson