Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: StormPrepper
Your words are hollow.

So, in using that logic you've touted so highly (I remember an LDS missionary once chiding me for using logic in my response to his proselytizing attempts), the implication of your post to which I responded is that if someone makes some very powerful and authoritative statement, that proves it to be true?

Thank you for that example of circular logic.

"Hi, I'm God."

"Why should I believe you?"

"Because God would never lie."

"Wow, I'm convinced!"

74 posted on 03/05/2015 10:23:47 AM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: william clark
Thank you for that example of circular logic.

There's nothing circular about it. What you're looking for is "appeal to authority".

the implication of your post to which I responded is that if someone makes some very powerful and authoritative statement, that proves it to be true?

I didn't say anything about proving truth, that's something you made up and added to it. I said authoritative and definitive. The last time that kind of language was used is in the New Testament and the Book of Mormon and is evident in the every section of the Doctrine and Covenants.

However, now that you've mentioned it, it is true. 100%.


75 posted on 03/05/2015 11:36:11 AM PST by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson