Disprove man made global warming?
Umm, isn’t that like proving a negative? Didn’t I learn in Logic 101 that that can’t be done?
But why bother? The current temperatures are within known variations from history, such as the Roman warm period and the Medieval warm period. Why don’t you prove the England was not a famous wine-growing region in Roman times? Or that Greenland was not green enough for farming during early Viking times?
And not by making stuff up, like CO2-causes-warming computer programs.
I continue to be amazed that people don’t look a history and just laugh warmists out of town.
Scientists are stupid. Historians rock!!!! Historians should have corrected the scientists who discovered the Greenhouse Effect (in the lab), then we’d have no debate today!!!!
There is enough information to declare warmism implausible, or at least no more so than coolism. What is staggering is the superficiality of the research. A humble soul would confess insufficient resources to answer the question of climate prediction, but far more resources to investigate how humanity could adapt if the global climate in fact does change.