Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: OldArmy52

In medieval times, there were very few scientists in Western Europe. The folks who were saying the world was flat were Catholic clergy.

Only a scant few “scientists,” and I use that term loosely because the scientific method was still a bit of a cottage industry in those days, were saying the world was round on account of the whole burning at the stake thing....which tends to be...demotivating.


101 posted on 02/03/2015 10:05:26 AM PST by AxeofCrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: AxeofCrom

In medieval times, there were very few scientists in Western Europe. The folks who were saying the world was flat were Catholic clergy.


That is history done with all the rigor of global warming science.

If you open up St. Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae, on the very first page he speaks of the differentiation of the sciences, explaining how the same fact may be shown by different sciences, and the examples he uses are how both the astronomer and physicist demonstrate that the earth is round, but by two different means. That work, written ca. 1270, was the standard work for training Catholic clergy for centuries.

When Columbus proposed setting sail for the new world, he did run into opposition from the clergy, not because they thought the world was flat, but because they had a fairly good idea of the circumference, as well as the location of the eastern edge of Asia—and if you put those two things together you need a great deal more water and food than Columbus was capable of carrying—sort of like setting out for the moon with a two-day supply of oxygen. Columbus argued that the circumference was actually much smaller. Columbus was wrong, but was fortunate enough to run into the new world.

Where did the flat earth myth come about, you may wonder? Washington Irving set out to write a popular history of Christopher Columbus, and found that the actual events were too complicated and too pro-Catholic—so he made up something that he thought would fly. Andrew Dixon White, first president of Cornell University (my alma mater) either bought into it or found it convenient, and between the two of them, it has become an impossible to eradicate myth. A quite convenient myth, in that it allows one to adopt an intellectual position that doesn’t have to bother with anything before the enlightenment.

If you want more details, read Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians by Jeffrey Burton Russell.


150 posted on 02/03/2015 6:27:51 PM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: AxeofCrom

In medieval times, there were very few scientists in Western Europe. The folks who were saying the world was flat were Catholic clergy.
That is history done with all the rigor of global warming science.

If you open up St. Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae, on the very first page he speaks of the differentiation of the sciences, explaining how the same fact may be shown by different sciences, and the examples he uses are how both the astronomer and physicist demonstrate that the earth is round, but by two different means. That work, written ca. 1270, was the standard work for training Catholic clergy for centuries.

When Columbus proposed setting sail for the new world, he did run into opposition from the clergy, not because they thought the world was flat, but because they had a fairly good idea of the circumference, as well as the location of the eastern edge of Asia—and if you put those two things together you need a great deal more water and food than Columbus was capable of carrying—sort of like setting out for the moon with a two-day supply of oxygen. Columbus argued that the circumference was actually much smaller. Columbus was wrong, but was fortunate enough to run into the new world.

Where did the flat earth myth come about, you may wonder? Washington Irving set out to write a popular history of Christopher Columbus, and found that the actual events were too complicated and too pro-Catholic—so he made up something that he thought would fly. Andrew Dixon White, first president of Cornell University (my alma mater) either bought into it or found it convenient, and between the two of them, it has become an impossible to eradicate myth. A quite convenient myth, in that it allows one to adopt an intellectual position that doesn’t have to bother with anything before the enlightenment.

If you want more details, read Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians by Jeffrey Burton Russell.


151 posted on 02/03/2015 6:28:32 PM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson