I've addressed the "is jus soli the exclusive rule" question. Twice, in fact: Post 181 and Post 221.
See how easy it is to link to a prior when one in fact has made a post in which the question is first copied, then the reply given?
Lol. You totally changed the question, and then claim you answered it.
The question is not whether jus soli is the exclusive rule.
The question is, according to the doctrine of jus soli that you have spent so much time on FR preaching, is Cruz eligible?
Yes or no?