‘You really need to go find some children to argue with. Perhaps they wouldn’t notice your malfunctioning logic and reliance on fallacy arguments.’
He told me once that the ‘proof’ that Stanley Ann was in HI during her pregnancy is that ‘her husband, Barack Obama I, would have seen her.’ I.e.: he said Obama Sr. was an eye-witness to her presence, case closed.
Yes, he really said that.
He has no comprehension of the term, ‘logical fallacy,’ and it doesn’t appear that anyone can explain it to him.
Liberalism rots the rational part of the brain. That’s why, as Churchill said, you either give liberalism up by a certain age or you lose your thinking faculties.
Talk about "begging the question". (Look that one up CpnKook) Yeah, he's a regular fallacy machine.
He has no comprehension of the term, ‘logical fallacy,’ and it doesn’t appear that anyone can explain it to him.
Absolutely. He seems to think he can make up in shrillness what he lacks in perspicacity. :)
If he was bothered by logical paradoxes, he would have gone into a shock trying to explain those 100,000 children of British Loyalists born in the United States after July 4, 1776.
Fortunately for him, the liberal brain has circuit breakers that can pop and allow him to wake up in fantasy land.