To: SoConPubbie
The relevancy starts with the fact, IE written, that the Constitution written and subscribed to by the Founders must have deliberately chosen different context with wording in Article I for Congress and/vs. Article II for POTUSA.
To: noinfringers2
The relevancy starts with the fact, IE written, that the Constitution written and subscribed to by the Founders must have deliberately chosen different context with wording in Article I for Congress and/vs. Article II for POTUSA.
So I take it you still cannot provide anything from the Constitution, US Law, or SCOTUS rulings that clearly and unambiguously defines "Natural Born" as requiring two US Citizen parents at birth, correct?
257 posted on
02/02/2015 11:12:25 AM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson