The only thing you asked before I asked you about Vattel was how Jus soli applied to Cruz. I've addressed the 3 times now. That I'm not giving the answer you want to hear isn't the same as not answering.
All the rest of your questions have arisen since I asked you about Vattel and the supposed two-citizen parent theory that DL, AmericanVictory and others insist on getting wrong.
Instead you desperately DEMAND that I go along with your frantic efforts to change the subject
I was discussing the two-citizen parent theory on January 24; you first got to this thread on January 30. I'm not changing the topic; you were the one who popped up trying to talk about immigration.
If you figure out the answer to whether you agree with DL and the others who read Vattel into Article II or whether you agree with Mr. Robinson and me that such theory is a bunch of historical and Constitutional hooey, let me know.
So now you’re lecturing me about how the discussion began. Fine, but let’s keep the facts straight.
You posted to me:
‘1. He claims that the jus soli rule of citizenship was not the original Constitutional view’
To which I responded:
‘Excuse me, but you DO want to see Ted Cruz elected this next go round, if the Good Lord delays His coming...right?’
You say you’ve answered that question 3 xs.
I say you have yet to answer it once.
Guess who’s right?