[SoConPubbie]

If that’s correct, why was Obama and his team doing everything they could to come up with proof he was born in Hawaii?

Who cares?

Please provide the relevant sections of the U.S. Constitution that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

Lacking that, Please provide the relevant sections of U.S. Federal Law that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

Lacking that, Please provide the relevant rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court that clearly and unambiguously define "Natural Born" as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.

You won't because you can't because they don't exist anywhere except in your mind and in sources that are not legal or constitutional in nature.


CRUZ or LOSE!

[Revel]

“Please provide the relevant sections of the U.S. Constitution that clearly and unambiguously define “Natural Born” as requiring two U.S. Citizens at birth.”

Lame. Obviously the meaning of the term “Natural Born” was as clear to the people of the time as the term “Thou shout not kill”. The only way to prove anything is to define what “Natural born citizen” meant. There is a common sense tendency to believe that it meant a lot. That it was in fact the strongest qualifying term used in the entire constitution. Because it is in fact so important to the survival of the country. I would be curious to see how ancient dictionaries defined the term.

I do know that anyone with any survival skills who was sitting down to write such a great constitution would be a fools to not raise that bar to an extreme level.

For me it would be a citizen born in the US to two US parents. With the only exclusion being any US citizen who fought in the revolutionary war.

[VerySadAmerican]

Why did you post that to me? I don’t disagree with you. I was just asking how Obama’s birth and his mother all figured into it....how it’s different or similar to Cruz.

[malia]

..... what if the father was not known and the mother is natural born.