ibid
this paultard makes TONS of statements that are OPINION
and NEVER backs them up
he assumes the reader agrees with his assumptions
i question his premise - no need to read his garbage he bases on his false premise
then IF we accept this wackjob’z theory, why would adopting an amendment to protect private property offend him?
this fool is begging to feel important - and drive traffic to his little wordpress blog - he is exposing himself instead
you wouldn't be the author, wouldya?