Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: logic101.net

Clinton was most definitely a socialist. He went to Moscow, wrote a letter about how he “loathed” the military, was trying to implement HillaryCare and dozens of other things that Obama eventually was able to get. He was just more Fabian than Obama, who is a Leninist, in a hurry to take power. Clinton was faced with a Republican Congress after 1994, and saw that he would have to go a little slower with his agenda in order to implement his agenda and keep the ball moving ever leftward. And so he invented “triangulation”. It was always phony, and he was always a committed socialist.


27 posted on 12/01/2014 7:37:43 PM PST by Defiant (How does a President reverse the actions of a dictator?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant

Just because Clinton “loathed” the military and doesn’t like the country does not mean he’s a socialist! With Clinton it was all about Clinton.

Obama is another story entirely, his agenda is all the matters. Although his policies seem to lean more to fascism than socialism.

Not all our enemies are socialists.


31 posted on 12/02/2014 4:57:01 AM PST by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun free zones?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson