Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

This “negligent discharge” is so conditional and situational that it would never legally fly outside of states or D.C. where guns are still effectively outlawed. While acting in the prevention of a felony, it would be an unconscionable “parsing” of an event.

According to Criminal Defense Lawyer.com, “You cannot commit an unlawful discharge of a weapon if you fire it accidentally. A prosecutor must show you intentionally fired the weapon, but does not have to show you did so maliciously or with the intention to hurt someone or damage property. Prosecutors typically show your intent from the circumstances surrounding the situation, witnesses testimony, or even your own statements.”


21 posted on 11/17/2014 6:38:16 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Unlawful discharge is not the same as negligent discharge.


22 posted on 11/17/2014 7:28:10 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson