[Thommas]

The law was initially struck down by a federal judge last week, who said the “alleged goal of preventing voter fraud does not outweigh the alleged discriminatory effect on the poor, African-Americans and Hispanics.”

There, fixed it.

The unbridled bias of this federal judge drips from the above statement (when uncorrected.)

[Thommas]

Furthermore, that statement is so poorly structured, as to its intent, that it is practically unintelligible from a legal standpoint.

Discriminatory to the poor, African-Americans and Hispanics? Where to begin in parsing the asininity in that phrase? So, a rich African-American is also beleaguered because they cannot afford an ID? Do we distinguish between Hispanics and Hispanic-Americans, as some are citizens and others are not but allowed to vote anyway? This badly constructed judgement reeks of political catch phrases.