Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo; Mark Modica; all the best; nascarnation; UNGN; Yo-Yo; cynwoody; cripplecreek; ...
Frozen pigs must be flying in hell, because Mark Modica and I actually agree about something. Cars over $50,000 should not get the tax credit. Buyers in the Tesla price range are unlikely to be swayed one way or the other by a $7,500 tax credit. Actually, it might be in Tesla's favor to change the law in this way.

The first 200,000 electric cars from each manufacturer are eligible for the credit. By implementing a $50,000 cutoff, Tesla could then “save” their remaining credits for their future $35,000 Model 3 that is set to come out in a couple of years. The current Model S has already gained traction in the market so why not save the credits for when they can make a bigger impact when the Model 3 comes to market? It is currently out of Tesla's hands at the moment and would have to be changed with federal legislation.

The democrats have suggested upping the tax credit to $10,000. I wonder if democrats and republicans could agree on a bill that said that only cars under $50,000 were eligible but that the credit would be $10,000.

How about an informal poll? If you had to choose today between A] the status quo or B] the above bill, what would you choose? (I know many would prefer option C] remove the credit altogether, but obviously that would not get past the Senate or the President's desk. I'm sure others would suggest option D] wait until we get a conservative President but polls suggest there is a significant chance Hillary might stop that from happening.)

What do you guys think?

17 posted on 10/16/2014 11:20:43 PM PDT by LogicDesigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LogicDesigner
Cars over $50,000 should not get the tax credit.

I think you're a moron.

There shouldn't be any tax credits. Period. Tesla, Toyota, Ford, Gubmint Motors (f-em). Doesn't matter.

The only legitimate role of taxation is to raise necessary revenue to fund the legitimate functions of the government.

It is not legitimate to use the tax code to influence behavior.

18 posted on 10/16/2014 11:31:03 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson