Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

There was no verifiable definition for the Race code number 9 that people investigating the birth certificate could find for 1961. The definitions were all from later years so Zullo was leaving that definition out if his report. But now that the CDC has verified that the code meant the same thing in 61 as what we had documented in 68 was the same definition then Zullo can use the code that appears on the BC. It’s just another piece to the BC puzzle but it does remove all arguments that were in place over that code.


59 posted on 10/05/2014 4:41:25 PM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: GregNH

I understood that it applied to race but the question is whose code list is correct.


67 posted on 10/05/2014 4:55:29 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson