So your response to my pointing out you keep repeating the same thing I've already addressed is to keep repeating it. I answered you in Post #426..
I said Scott interviewed friends and family of S.A. I never said Scott quoted them. I said they gave "testimony" to Scott; but I never said Scott quoted any part verbatim.
In any event, the topic here is eligibility, and no matter whether Scott quoted her sources or not, and no matter even if Scott had never written her book, Hawaii's verification of Obama's birth facts means he's eligible.
How do you even have the chutzpah to post me again? Your bluffing and blundering got old eons ago.
For something like the ten millionth time, here is what you said:
“There was at least one biographical piece done on Stanley Ann where the author went and spoke with persons who knew about her relationship with Obama, Jr. So the sort of testimony you appear to be seeking is out there.”
It is a LIE. You lied. You look ridiculous trying to bluff your way past it. You LIED.
Either post the ‘testimony’ or stop looking sillier by the minute. Not even every anti-birther is stupid. You are making a laughingstock of yourself even amongst your compatriots. I guarantee many of them just wish you would shut up.
Of course, they would all breathe a massive sigh of relief if you could/would just post the ‘testimony’.
Put up or shut up.