Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CpnHook

‘And which post are you claiming contained that answer?’

You had your chance to read the answer the first time I posted it.

Barring that, you could read the answer literally thousands of times on FR birther threads.

If you didn’t read it then, too bad. I’m not playing your game.

Or perhaps I will, just once more.

But first, you go back through my four or five most recent posts and answer all the questions you have avoided. There are at least half a dozen. Probably more. Give me halfway decent answers, and just maybe for the thousandth and one batritlianth time I’ll answer the other question.

Take it or leave it.


360 posted on 10/29/2014 12:53:43 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter
You had your chance to read the answer the first time I posted it.

Here you LIE again. There is not a single post you've made to me on this thread that even so much as acknowledges the Hawaiian verifications (and their significance under the Full Faith & Credit clause), let alone attempts to explain why such don't establish Obama's eligibility.

If you wish to claim otherwise, cite the post (by number) and show where your "answer" even mentions these things.

You will fail here, because you never addressed them.

364 posted on 10/29/2014 1:19:10 PM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson