And in that paragraph you mention no source. In the paragraph that follows, you talk about Dreams and Cashill. So, yeah, it looked like you were attributing this to Cashill, because no one else was then mentioned.
Whether Ayers helped Obama a lot or a little, or whether the writing quality in Dreams appears higher than other contemporaneous samples is due to Obama having gotten some editorial assistance from some person(s) can be debated. But the entire topic has precious little at best (actually, nothing) to do with eligibility.
‘But the entire topic has precious little at best (actually, nothing) to do with eligibility.’
Wrong. Wrong wrong wrong.
The person who discovered, as I’ve said, from multiple sources, all FRIENDS of the Obamas, and who supplied ***specific*** details, did not have to dig for the info. This Obama loving liberal merely had to interview Obama’s Hyde Park neighbors. He discovered that Ayers didn’t “help” with the writing; Ayers wrote it.
The point being, this is the type of info that is discovered when a candidate is VETTED. Vetted, get it? You claim Obama was vetted. He was not. Not even nominally. If so, one of the first things discovered would have been that he had no part in the actual writing of the memoir for which he received so much praise & adulation. After all, when a candidate has no qualifications or achievements, the ability to write his own memoir counts.
Except that Obama didn’t.
He lied, and said he did.
The most superficial vetting would have exposed his lie.
But Obama was not vetted At All.
As I’ve said before, you blow up your own arguments. You say Obama is eligible because he’s been vetted. I present hard evidence that there was no vetting At All.
& you say it doesn’t matter.
You & logic must meet some time. It will be quite a shock, at least for you.