Right before. He wanted to confirm the data, and he and she went back and forth. My sense was she got fed up with him and said what ever she felt would get him off of her back.
Really though, if he has the proof of that he can’t be held accountable for her doing that.
With me she was rude and abrupt. Insisted the manual she was sending me was “the one I wanted”.
It took me a day and a half to get anyone with a sliver of a brain to work with me.
“he can’t be held accountable for her doing that.”
His overdependence on Dr. Corsi made him vulnerable to putting out misinformation.
The next day (July 18th) he went on ABC15 news and talked about an article written 10 to 15 years ago by a guy named Bennett (I suspect he meant the 1955 article by Dr. Charles Bennett).
http://www.wnd.com/files/CHARLESBENNETT.pdf
He used that article as confirmation of what Verna Lee told Dr. Corsi about how BCs were numbered monthly.
“...an article written I believe ten, fifteen years ago by an individual last name Bennett, no relations to the Secretary of State that outlined these procedures. She almost hits it right on the head. I mean she takes it right to the tee. As far as the coding the way they were numerically numbered by batch. She verifies it.”
Only problem the article never spells out when BCs were numbered. Never even mentions the numbers. In fact Dr. Corsi wrote a WND piece that says the same Bennett article proves that BCs were numbered when they were first registered.
http://www.wnd.com/2011/05/299781/
I suspect Zullo didn’t read Dr. Bennett’s article but went completely off what Corsi told him it said.
I got a question for you Lady. The codes were used by the data entry operators to input information into their computer systems for federal and state - correct?
And before 1968, what code(s) were used for ‘unknown or not stated’ for any blank boxes in birth certificates? They must have had a way to inform the data entry operators or whoever processed the information before the year 1968?
I’m sure plenty of mothers even back then may not have had the information about the fathers as an example.