A 23 minute excerpt of the Zullo hr interview with Gillar. Listen around the 17:18 minute mark about the codes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JyGSuWIrA8#t=917
And
A flashback of a local Phoenix tv news interview of Zullo. Zullo goes over the codes local HI and Federal.
I spoke directly with both Corsi and Zullo before I published. One thing that did not seem to be well understood or relayed was that the FED codes may actually be different than the local/state. In fact, the fed code manual at no time instructs the puncher to use any pre-written codes. That FEDERAL code book therefore has ZERO to do with what those codes mean. The feds didn’t write them nor reference them. At all. They read from the certificate parents race fields to determine how to code the infant.
That does not mean that the STATE/Local coder didn’t use the same codes as the Feds, (in ‘61 “9” would be “other non-white”) - but we still do not have proof of that as far as I know.
The CDC person he refers to is the same one that sent me the manual, she is a upper management level person. Zullo had not known prior to that presentation that Corsi got so much of “his” stuff straight from ... BLOGGERS! And had not confirmed all of it. The image from the 1968 Federal manual that was used in the presentation was a image from the blog The Daily Pen for example, but Corsi had the script written to claim it was a ‘61.
The issue to me is still going to only be important or relevant IF they have found a genuine HI Dept of Health coding instruction manual. I do know that the States had their own. The indication is that they were not all identical to the Fed codes. That is why the Feds had to have a manual and detailed instruction.
FWIW, Zullo told me that he had spent about 5 hours on the phone with the woman at the CDC. He told me that shortly after the event, and some other info I won’t relate. Was he being dramatic? Perhaps.
If they don’t have a HI manual nothing about the codes really matters.