>> Okay, so when you lose and are made to look silly because of your apparent lack critical thinking skills you get nasty?
It’s offensive when people put words in your mouth that you never uttered.
You keep asserting the the Judiciary determines the Constitutionality of the Constitution.
Let me give you and example of erroneous thinking such as yours but from a different source. This was pulled from an online source having nothing to do with today’s current events. It’s a 2nd grade explanation yet still manages to get it wrong. My comments in []’s
“The U.S. Congress can pass laws that are consistent with constitutional provisions, [Checks okay]
but ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court is charged with interpreting and enforcing constitutional provisions. [SCOTUS cannot enforce anything. It’s enforced by Public Opinion and the political process, the Supreme Court is not ‘Charged’. It assumed the responsibility of judicial review as a fall out from Maybury vs. Madison.]
The Supreme Court’s authority even includes the power to declare Congressional acts unconstitutional” [only common or statue laws written by Congress are deemed unconstitutional, through the assumed Judicial review from Maybury vs. Madison]
Furthermore, In Nixon v. United States (1993), the Supreme Court determined that the federal judiciary cannot review such proceedings — I.E impeachment and subsequent trial.
So, this judicial review is not a provision or an enumeration of the Constitution. It is an inferred provision found in Maybury vs. Madison.
I asked you 3 times for the provision (enumeration) or inference. You could provide neither. One doesn’t exist, and the other you didn’t even know about. So how much credence am I supposed to give you when you don’t even know what you’re talking about ... Pal.