Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: lbryce

Why wouldn’t the “amulet” be a phylactery (Tefillin)? Early Christians were also Jews, or had been Jews. Isn’t this just a phylactery Christian style? Why make it sound like a superstition?


23 posted on 09/06/2014 8:15:44 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: madison10
The early Christians in the book of Acts were very much aware of phylacteries, being as they were Jews, they were heavily persecuted by their fellow Jews and the Romans, yet we read nowhere in the book of Acts that they strapped phylacteries on their head and arm as protective amulets. Neither do we see directives in the epistles for their readers when threatened with persecution to do so.

The kingdom of God was an external thing in the Old Testament, the phylacteries for instance, certain scriptures attached to their heads and arms; as opposed to the New Testament which is the kingdom of God internalized, Luke 17:20, 21. i.e., the revelation of Jesus Christ.

29 posted on 09/06/2014 1:17:48 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson