More big talk, but no explanation by GilesB on the downward trajectory of 2 wounds, no abrasions. Yawn
It’s an autopsy report. Now we’re being fickle with information huh? hahahahaa
You can easily read elsewhere the trajectory of a round from eye thru jaw to collarbone. Let’s not be coy.
“Brown had abrasions on his face from where he fell to the ground, but there was ‘otherwise no evidence of a struggle.’”
Again, research those findings, it’s in many articles, they are from the autopsy report. No damage to body other than minor abrasion to face. No sign of altercation.
So as of now, with what’s been presented (which people will accept or not) this is what we have.
I am not a forensic scientist, it is not for me to explain it. Neither are you - but I know your claims of what MUST have happened is just pure poppycock. You have proven you have no grasp of logic, and you continue to ignore the simple fact that lack of abrausons does not prove that he didn’t fall forward.
You nor nobody else has prodiced an autopsy report that I have seen. Lot’s of tald about what is supposedly said, but not report that I’ve seen...and I’m fairly certain that all you’ve seen are second hand talk about what the report said.
You claim more knowledge and expertise than I believe you have.
You big bag of wind! I just listened to the medical examiner from NYC, who was hired by the Brown family to do the second autopsy.
Here’s what he said - all shots were from the front, he said nothing about any significance regarding the shot in the head.
He also said “we have seen no forenisic evidence yet” - now if he hasn’t seen any forensic evidence, I HIGHLY doubt that you have.
Finally - you said “no abrasions” refering to the autopsy report...and you lie, there were abrasions to the face. Abrasions to the face are abrasions, Mr. Fickle With The Facts!