Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomStar3028
Right, but if it can’t intercept the missile. Then it has to catch it. At that point how can there be enough time to catch it? 90% of the time.

Using the American football analogy of a defender apparently behind but to the side of a runner "having the angle" on the runner and making the tackle.

Secondly, the Iron Dome missile may be significantly faster than those of Hamas.

17 posted on 08/18/2014 2:36:08 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: fso301

Exactly, but if the trajectory changes due to any factor, or there isn’t enough time, it should miss. How can the early warning system calculate all those factors and intercept 90% of the time? It seems beyond remarkable. Maybe with multiple intercept points and ID missiles fired, I could see 90%. But they only fire 2 interceptors per rocket, correct? There are so many factors that can change the trajectory. Are the intercept points calculated on launch towards apogee, or after apogee? Or both? Is there enough time?

Burn time, wind, weight and time all factor into calculating the intercept. So if you got one wrong, then you would be making the best estimation. All of this has to be done by a computer, unless you have plenty of time. I imagine Israel doesn’t have much time from launch to impact.


23 posted on 08/18/2014 2:52:28 AM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson