Posted on 08/10/2014 8:06:44 AM PDT by IChing
I don’t love him as a candidate. I’m speculating on what may or may not be the most realistic path to the WH.
Have a nice evening.
Still promoting Romney with your tired attacks on reagan republicans and conservatives?
You and Romney managed to lose an election that the GOP couldn’t lose, you better start reevaluating your brilliance and how you pick your candidates.
The high demand is actually from the nationwide electorate who wish they’d voted him in last time. Pay attention.
You have no love for Willard, yet you criticize those who refused to die on the battlefield for the most deceitful fraud and backstabbing weasel ever put up by the Republican Party for the highest office in the land. That, sir, is disgusting.
Get it through your head, sir. I don’t vote for Socialist RINOs, liars, frauds, ringers, narcissists, backstabbers, con-artists or establishment-uber-alles toadies. If you have a problem with that, I have to question your conscience.
And just how did I do that?
Why you keep posting here, along with others, if it’s so boring? Over 225 replies so far....
Not a good candidate. A not good candidate makes mistakes. Romney stayed home. He didn’t criticize, or emphasize Obama’s Marxism. He didn’t think there was anything wrong with the Marxism. No pointing out any of the faults at all. It wasn’t a mistake. It was by design and completely intentional.
We saw him go after Gingrich. So he knows how to attack people who he believes oppose him. He does not believe Obama is his opposition. He likes Obama and the democrats. He just refuses to attack people he agrees with.
Any candidate who supports Marxist opposition is a traitor to the US.
High demand ? It’s typical leftist baiting media nonsense to try to lure that LOSER into running again in 2016 so Hillary (or Lieawatha) can beat him easily. Pay attention.
Hour was never my pick, genius. Try to comprehend what is written.
Who are you supporting in 2016 ? Name, please ?
No, nothing has changed for Romney, this is purely an anti-Obama thing, and based on the last name they remember running against him.
Romney didn’t lose an election that was impossible to lose, after running for it through two election cycles and 7 years, just as some sort of fluke, it is what he does.
We don’t even know why he is in politics, or why when he was trying to decide between running as a democrat or republican, he chose republican.
Because somebody's got to step up and respond to the Romneybots.
Yeah, she came across to me that way, too. Lashing out at someone because a simple word like erstwhile isn’t in her vocabulary, and she can’t be troubled to look it up....
Romneybots, the undying breed that never stop chanting, “but he isn’t Obama”, now they are on their THIRD election cycle push for Romney.
Well, in their trial baloons, they tried Christie, then Jeb, so now they’re hauling out old Myth. Who’s next in their RINO bag of tricks I wonder?
Willard was raised as a left-winger by daddy & mama. What better way to destroy the opposition than by infiltrating them from within ? Curiously, the GOP establishment loves these left-wingers and does nothing to drive them out. If we had similar people trying to infiltrate the Democrats to undermine their Stalinist agenda, they’re weeded out and shown the door in short order.
You mean TURD cycle.
I’ll explain how this is going to work.
The Clintons are going to point out that a D POTUS win is pretty much inevitable in 2016.
So you better vote for Hillary in the D primary or you get Lizzie Warren (aka Obama’s 3rd term).
Fully grasp the implications of your first sentence, and you will see why Romney is being touted again. Reality trumps wishful thinking in politics. In a marketing sense, Romney is already somewhat of an incumbent, with that advantage. The sheeple have the final say, not us zealots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.