To: 2ndDivisionVet
Uygur said Hannity couldnt last a debate where he didnt control the format and setting After listening to some of Hannity's debates on the radio and some of the interaction between him and hostile callers i suspect the Turk may have made a valid observation. Hannity means well but he too often misses the other's point and argues against obviously misunderstood positions. If he could understand more quickly he might not sound like he just lost the argument even as he triumphantly ends a call.
16 posted on
07/28/2014 6:54:56 PM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
To: arthurus
No, Sean is no intellectual, but he’s much more successful than Mr. Uygur and they’re both in the same business, so there must be something going on there.
18 posted on
07/28/2014 6:57:31 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: arthurus
Hannity is the luckiest guy in the world.
Came up just as Limbaugh was exploding and rode his coattails all the way to the bank.
Cretin still shills for Romney and has him on as a guest.
The Turk is right about Sean’s debating skills, the minute somebody starts eating his lunch, their mic is cut.
22 posted on
07/28/2014 7:29:35 PM PDT by
Rome2000
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson