To: MileHi
I agree. The intent of the law was clearly that the states would setup exchanges. It was intended to “make” or provide incentive for them to do so.
9 posted on
07/24/2014 9:21:33 AM PDT by
kjam22
(my music video "If My People" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74b20RjILy4)
To: kjam22
That is my take. They were too clever by half, now they want another do-over.
13 posted on
07/24/2014 9:31:31 AM PDT by
MileHi
To: kjam22
To argue intent is disegenuous considering even the speaker admitidly knew not what was contained in the bill.
23 posted on
07/24/2014 10:06:19 AM PDT by
rsobin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson