Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The fact that Cokie Roberts is a regular pretty much tells you everything you need to know. And there was a time when the "majority" was okay with chattel slavery and women not voting. Do they want to return to that?
1 posted on 07/10/2014 10:41:24 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Effing idiot. The WSJ isn’t remotely conservative outside some (but not all) of the opinion section. Joe might know this if he could bother to put down his copy of Mother Jones.


2 posted on 07/10/2014 10:44:17 AM PDT by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The problem with Scarborough is he knows what he's saying is patent bullish*t.

Most of these wastes of skin in the media have lived in the progressive shell their whole lives and have no idea how ludicrous their worlview is, but Joe knows. Hookers have more integrity.

3 posted on 07/10/2014 10:46:06 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nixon was going to be impeached for covering up illegal activities by his campaign. This administration has used multiple departments of the government to go after political opponents. Which one is worse?


4 posted on 07/10/2014 10:47:10 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

To what extent is the WSJ sympathetic with big government subsides and benefits towards big business? To that extent, the WSJ is sympathetic with unconstitutional socialism and accompanying abuses.


5 posted on 07/10/2014 10:47:50 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Who did the Wall Street Journal poll..Daily Kos members LOL..WOW, no wonder Mark Levin calls this “Network” MSLSD..first of all, who gives a flying sack of poo what Mika(And her anti semite daddy) and Joe(Hey Joe, at least Sarah Palin didn’t find a dead intern in her office) think


6 posted on 07/10/2014 10:52:43 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It couldn’t be that the WSJ has moved left, oh nooooooo.

When Robert Bartley died and Paul Gigot, the resident “conservative” at PBS took over the editorial page, it became all amnesty all the time.


7 posted on 07/10/2014 10:53:29 AM PDT by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Making an assertion - no matter how ludicrous - is the same as stating a fact when your listeners are uneducated.


8 posted on 07/10/2014 10:53:34 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL-GALT-DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If MSLSD ever fires him maybe Joe can get a job on The View as their conservative voice.


9 posted on 07/10/2014 10:55:23 AM PDT by McGruff (It's not the crime, it's the cover-up they said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The liberal media supporting a tyrannical administration and labeling those who object as extremists?

Have they progressed so far that they think they have outgrown a basic principle of our republic:

"GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE"

It's now government of the bureaucrats, by politicians , and for the well connected.

11 posted on 07/10/2014 10:58:29 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Too extreme Even for the "There Shall Be Open Borders" Wall Street Journal? That's so extreme...
12 posted on 07/10/2014 11:32:22 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Max Boot destroyed the WSJ editorial page when he turned it into a strict neocon propaganda sheet. Thankfully, his era is over. But it will never be the dynamic must-read that it was in the ‘80s-’90s.


13 posted on 07/10/2014 12:31:57 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Peace On Earth! Purity of Essence! McCain/Ripper 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good gravy!! If 0bama’s activities taken at face value are not sufficient enough for impeachment, just what would these talking heads think *IS* impeachable?

Now, I don’t know if impeaching 0bama would actually cause him any political harm — consider Clinton came out of it with even better ratings and is still a political rock-star among the kool-aid drinkers. But that doesn’t mean impeaching 0bama is a far-fetched idea due to lack of evidence. compared to what Nixon & Clinton were impeached for, 0bama should be a slam dunk to an *objective* media (which no longer exists).


15 posted on 07/10/2014 5:07:50 PM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson