Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: research99
Or do you concur with Justice Roberts, that a statute originating in the Senate yet originating a new “tax” is valid constitutionally?

Funny you should ask, I wrote something on just that subject. But in order to properly assess my argument, you'll first have to morally assess my life. Isn't that how you roll, in your collective? After all, who needs logic and reasoning, when the group can vote on their feelings? And isn't group feelings the very definition of morality - and therefore the legitimacy of someone's position? heck, you don't even need to hear from the person that way, do you? Thanks for illustrating what pelosi meant when she said we "have to pass it, to find out what's in it." You're just a poster boy.

As for your question, here's my answer. Use a dictionary for the big words, and if you really get stuck, ask your group about it's feelings in the matter.

One Stone, Two Powers: How Chief Justice Roberts Saved America

81 posted on 06/24/2014 2:52:50 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

No, I have to consult a gay prostitute to determine what my feelings should be (/sarc)


83 posted on 06/24/2014 2:55:59 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson