The way I understand it is that Mikki Booth knows/is friends with Johanna Ah’Nee.
Johanna Ah’Nee was born the same month as Barack Obama. Mikki Booth’s son was also born in Hawaii and she had previously offered his BC for examination.
Through Miki Booth, Johanna Ah’Nee offered her BC, too.
If Vogt’s theory is correct about how the birth certificates are numbered, then the Booth and Ah’Nee certificates would have to be frauds, because they follow the same sort of numbering plan as Obama’s.
If Vogt is wrong, and the BCs were numbered a different way - then he unjustly accused both Booth and Ah’Nee of fraud - something they didn’t do. I think that the way anti-birthers say is that they were collected at the end of the month and put into alphabetical order then numbered.
IIRC, Jerome Corsi believes the numbering system that Mikki Booth’s BC shows, so I wonder why Vogt didn’t suspect him, too?
For the record, based on working in the school office when I was in high school, I believe that the numbering system where the records were kept till the end of the month makes sense. IOW, I think Mikki Booth and her friend are telling the truth.
Back when we didn’t have computers to use for such things and no way to easily look up records by number, we tried to alphabetize as much as we could and we always waited till the end of the month to organize things. Always. The first of the next month was when tardies, absences, and transfers were sorted for the previous month.
That way, if you needed to know if so-and-so was tardy in September, you went to September’s records, and then went to their place in the alphabet to find their records.
Otherwise, if they were kept in the order that they came in, you could have to sort through dozens or even hundreds of records before finding what you needed.
It was the only way that made any kind of sense. It made all of the girls in the office really good at alphabetizing, too! :)
Interesting, thanks.