[Zeneta]

This is where it gets interesting.

Progressives fight for more and more “Laws” and “authority” to battle against the Constitution, and to be exercised by more and more government.

That is a fact and is not anarchy.

They may “think” it is, but it’s not.

It’s communism.

And when they co-opt businesses to go along with this, it is Fascism.

Pure Capitalism is Anarchy, freedom within the rule of law.

Contract law and property rights.

And BTW, capitalism is the purest form of human nature.

They, the Progressives, want to reject human nature. Their very own nature, in order to account for the increasing number of simple minded zombies that they themselves create.

They reject the objective, and favor the subjective.

This is not anarchy.

They may use “anarchist” tactics and messages in their attempts to destroy what their simple minded compatriots perceive to be the state of affairs. But what they promote is government, more rules, laws and regulations that destroy the “self” for the “greater” good.

Anarchy is the Militia standoff in Nevada.

Communism is the “occupy Wall street” display.

OWS and progressives are fighting for more government controls while defenders of the Bundy ranch are fighting against government.

Who are the anarchists ?

[PapaNew]

I think you miss the point of the meaning and thrust of the word "anarchy." The point of "anarchy" is not "the absence of laws" but disorder, chaos and confusion. A law by definition is a constraint on your freedom. The more laws, the less freedom. If you could have peace and harmony without laws that would be great. That is desirable. But we know that's not possible. But we do know that society can be free and happy with a minimal amount of laws and those laws are just laws.

The point of anarchy is the disorder, chaos and confusion. A valid definition of anarchy does not include a society that is peaceful and free.