Marita Noon is the executive director for Energy Makes America Great Inc. and the companion educational organization, the Citizens Alliance for Responsible Energy (CARE). Together they work to educate the public and influence policy makers regarding energy, its role in freedom, and the American way of life. Combining energy, news, politics, and the environment through public events, speaking engagements, and media, the organizations combined efforts have made Marita Americas voice for energy. Marita is also a columnist for Townhall.com and a regular contributor to The Energy Tribune, Conservative Action Alerts, and EPAAbuse.com. Additionally her writing can be found in numerous newspapers and websites. Maritas twentieth book, Energy Freedom, is her first in the current affairs genre. As a conservative commentator and energy expert, she is known as Marita Noon. Readers of Maritas previous books, including best sellers, Wired That Way and Communication Plus, know her as Marita Littauer. Prior to her work in energy, Marita was known as a motivational speaker and author. She has trained thousands of men and women in spoken and written communication.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
2 posted on
04/14/2014 8:38:16 PM PDT by
keat
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yes I believe fracking prohibition was a factor behind Obama’s decision to unleash the BLM dogs.
Last week I heard directly a top manager of one of the USA’s biggest pipeline operators in the Bakken say that environmentalists told Obama that if he allowed Keystone to go forward that they would ‘crucify’ him. What they meant by that is anybody’s guess but one can speculate that it means to drop his protection from investigations, lawsuits, impeachment etc.
The environmentalists in California are militant about fracking there. It’s not a stretch for them to look at having BLM close off huge sections of lands for a desert tortoise or some contrived pretext especially when such lands are available for oil and gas leases involving fracking.
So yes it is not only plausible but actually probable.
3 posted on
04/14/2014 8:51:29 PM PDT by
Hostage
(ARTICLE V)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t buy the fracking angle on this story. I’ve seen fracking in PA and I am sure the methods are not much different anywhere else. First, the impact comes from drilling and that does not take up more than an acre of of land (less roads to get to the pad). Second, fracking is an extraction technique that does not require additional space than the existing well head. What is one acre in a section of land? Particularly when hundreds of sections of land are involved?
4 posted on
04/14/2014 8:51:57 PM PDT by
ConservativeInPA
(We need to fundamentally transform RATs lives for their lies.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A compromise has been reached. The cattle agree to stop stepping on the turtles if the turtles stop whining about being endangered.
5 posted on
04/14/2014 8:53:24 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(Are all Democrats inveterate, habitual liars?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Successful Drilling has been done in the ‘hood.
6 posted on
04/14/2014 8:56:01 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Negligible possibility of oil and gas. It’s all about the solar farm Benjamins.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
OK they lost me the moment I read Fracking Lease, no such critter exists.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson