Replies

To: ghost of nixon; 2ndDivisionVet; null and void; Nachum; maggief; WildHighlander57

Author of this blog is a freeper. Read his book. He’s got the goods on Reid. Please help distribute and assimilate

http://www.futurnamics.com/reid_bundyranch.php

51 posted on 04/13/2014 2:58:23 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)

To: Buckhead; Josh Painter; LucyT; onyx; Sontagged; Salena Zito; Jim Robinson

56 posted on 04/13/2014 3:02:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)

To: hoosiermama; All

http://www.futurnamics.com/reid_bundyranch.php

The referenced article includes the following wording:

... desert BLM land ...

First, why did Sean Hanity allegedly say that the land in question is state land?

Next, if the feds do own the land in which case Hanity is wrong, then did they acquire it by proper compensation according to either the Constitution's Clause 17 of Section 8 of Article I, or the eminent domain clause of the 5th Amendment?

Otherwise, if the land was acquired by the feds bureaucratically and without compensation, the BLM has no constitutional authority to call the shots concerning the land imo.

What constitutional clause am I overlooking that gives any federal agency the right to tell people what to do concerning land that the feds do not own?

100 posted on 04/13/2014 4:24:52 PM PDT by Amendment10

141 posted on 04/14/2014 7:00:24 AM PDT by pke

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794