Protypical liberal idea format:
1: Propose and activate for a non-reality-based wide-ranging utopian change to society, that
2: appears to be proffered from a “higher moral ground” eg; “we have to offer these poor underpaid workers ways to help them with their families” so that
3: anyone who opposes them is immediately brandable as a hateful, spiteful, greedy bigot who wishes to keep members of the underclass down.
Absolutely every one of their ideas follows this pattern. Global warming, gays in the military, homosexual marriage, unwillingness to profile Muslims in a security context, healthcare for everyone, on and on.
And so any time you offer opposition, you are on this lower level where you have to make the case that you aren’t a bigot before you even get to the substance of the underlying idea and you will never get to pointing out the possible negative consequences before they change the subject or circle back to the racist dirtbomb-toss.
Every liberal idea works this way, without exception. Offered as a grand solution to a societal problem from an assumed elevated moral position, without regard to any possible misconception or wrong-way consequence and sounding so benevolent and altruistic it cannot be opposed except by (you) a sociopath or psychopath.
And THAT is why women adore the Democrat Party. Their whole schtick is to short circuit reasoning and logic and go straight for the emotional kill.
Women eat that stuff up. They don’t think about rational outcomes or common sense barriers, the LOVE the sound of the idea, it sounds so soft and caring, and their are hooked like a tuna.
This is why men don’t generally vote for Democrats and why women eagerly eat out of the palm of Democrat’s hands.
It’s all about the emotion.
Very well said, what you said.