“1. It generally is argued from a God-less perspective; i.e, there IS and WAS no Divine action.”
Name one science that is NOT argued from a God-less perspective.
I know, I know, ... Angels keep the airplanes aloft.
Angels might be keeping the physical laws going, but that is not something the physical sciences should presume to declare upon, one way or the other.
Engineering science requires no discussion of the supernatural. Well except maybe for designing for ‘acts of God’.
But I get your point.
Evolution could be a very interesting ‘science’ if ONE side would permit the ‘other’ side to maintain a belief in God. Science should not have to preclude the supernatural in order to make progress. God ordered the universe. Science discovers and maps outs those orders.
IT all depends on your starting point.