[Ray76]

I'm talking about election officials, not an amicus brief submitted to a court but not accepted. Election officials where defrauded.

The verification letter is a fraud and has long been discredited.

This is the fraud:

• I have official records containing five facts.
• You present three items and ask me to verify them.
• I verify that those three items match items in my official records.
• Further, I certify that the information contained in my official records was used to verify the facts.

Do you have the facts? Has information been concealed?

This is precisely what Onaka did.

[Nero Germanicus]

The Georgia and Mississippi Certificates of Live Birth were not submitted in amicus briefs. They were submitted by the defense as defense exhibits.
There has been no adjudication in any jurisdiction that the Certified Letters of Verification from the Hawaii Registrar were fraudulent.
Two Republican Secretaries of State accepted them, used them to approve Obama for their states’ ballots and both Secretaries of State went on the record stating that their questions had been answered satisfactorily.
If I, as the recipient, ask you to verify certain data and I accept your verification of that data, where is the crime or the injury? Has anyone filed suit or criminal charges in Arizona or Kansas subsequent to the receipt of the Hawaii Certified Letters of Verification? The answer is “no.”
If a document is alleged to be fraudulent, you PROSECUTE the alleged perpetrator of the fraud after a grand jury investigation. That has never happened. An allegation is not a conviction.