There you go, confusing the discussion with actual facts. Bold face, unsupported assertions are so much more appealing, don’t you agree? Muddying the waters will court opinions is not fair, in my view.
If Tennessee Nana says that it is so, then it must be. Argument over. That’s why these birther threads have gone no where in the past eight years, people won’t just get on board the looney train. They insist on evidence. It’s damn frustrating.
If it comes to a choice between the Indiana Supreme Court, and Nana, the smart money would go with Nana.