[editor-surveyor]

The circumcision requirement was for the temple.

When the temple was destroyed, the relevance of circumcision became a tradition, rather than a need under Torah.

The renewed covenant has no requirement for circumcision of the flesh. Paul explained that several times.He spoke of “circumcision of the heart” being equivalent.

[RansomOttawa]

The circumcision requirement was for the temple. When the temple was destroyed, the relevance of circumcision became a tradition, rather than a need under Torah.

What temple was Abraham, or his descendants for 400 years, required to be circumcised for?

[metmom]

The circumcision requirement was for the temple.

Circumcision was given BEFORE the Law. it was merely reiterated there.

So you're wrong again......