Replies

I'm tempted to take this as a good sign. One of the liberal rags in Phoenix managed to get the Feds to hand over a heavily redacted copy of the FBI files compiled as part of their Eric Holder-ordered witch hunt against the Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Despite the redacted details, the article from The People's Republic utilized their crack team of opinion editors to cleverly peel away the black redaction markups and discover that underneath those marks was nothing but really terrible stuff about how Arpaio is corrupt and racist and friendly to evil capitalists and willing to punish law breakers even if they couldn't help it because our insufficiently distributed wealth lured them over the border.

Contributors Yvonne Wingett Sanchez and Dennis Wagner (at least one of whom is doubtlessly the mild-mannered alias of our very own Jamese) can't spell out in exact terms the startling revelations about Joe's meanness and evilness, but they need us to "just trust [them], because it all shows real good that the sheriff is real, real unkind and grumpy and maybe even a little unlegal and church-going and also all kinds of other super bad stuff like that!"

Anyway, maybe some people out there are getting increasingly convinced that the MCSO has pulled together solid evidence in the as yet undisclosed case against the Obama fraud, and they're getting desperate to muffle Joe's voice.

Hey, I can at least hope?

Oh they got Arpaio cold in the first and second paragraphs according to the clowns at AZ Central Committee! First para..

" Federal investigators concluded there was sufficient evidence to bring charges against public officials during their years-long abuse-of-power investigation targeting Maricopa County law-enforcement agencies"

Then it all falls apart in the third paragraph as we get this!

"Ultimately, federal prosecutors in August 2012 closed the three-year FBI criminal investigation and grand-jury probe into Sheriff Joe Arpaio, former County Attorney Andrew Thomas and their top deputies, saying there would be no indictments due to a lack of evidence or an insurmountable burden of proof."

What's that psycho term? Oh yes, Cognitive dissonance!