Replies

Rood wouldn’t know the true scripture of the one true God if it hit him between the eyes. Ask him about his MIV

I disagree with you CB, of course, In fact, it seems to me you're the one who would not know true scripture from bird poop hitting you on the head; worse you don't seem to want to know what the truth is. This based on what we've seen from your comments here to date.

In this comment for example, you take Michaels Rood's attempt to translate scripture into his own personal language (i.e., the Marine Infantry Version) and try to twist it into some kind of dark/sinister plot to change the Holy scriptures. To me, you're the sinister party here. For sure you're not being honest or bearing true witness in the least.

And Michael Rood's quote, you quoted on your post: "I recommend that every one writes his own version of every sentence that they study in the Scriptures"; proves that he wasn't trying to change the scriptures - he was trying to "better understand" what the FULL MEANING of what he was reading, was...

So that makes your statement: "So when Rood and his followers say the follow scripture understand it’s not the original scripture inspired by the Holy Spirit.", a complete and total lie that you're trying to foster on others reading these comments that don't know you, or the number of dishonest falsehoods you and others have been spreading, with no regard to the Almighty's commandment to not bear false witness. But then I suppose your grace perversion churchianity doctrine exempts you from that commandment and every other that you care to disregard.

I will give you +1 for at least making an effort to bring some of Rood's original writings to task. That's a bit better at least than your previous lies, with no attempt whatsoever to back them up. At least you are now improving. In that regard, taking steps closer toward Glory; therein giving hope you make come into even more light.

What a bunch of poppycock! Adding words, changing scripture to force a meaning is exactly what Rood does in his “MIV” (Marine Infantry Version) of scripture which he quotes on his website.

Not only that but anyone can do a little research to find out that the Shem Tov he uses, at least to a great extent, is a totally corrupt manuscript. And don’t say he doesn’t use the Shem Tov. The supposed Hebrew version he uses is based primarily on the Shem Tov.

You guys like to either hide or ignore all the corruption of Rood and the corrupted texts he uses but it’s out there for anyone looking for truth.

I don’t need to lie or mislead. I simply point to the evidence.