Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There is no excuse for any new design to not be “walkaway safe”, so in the event of total loss of cooling power like at Fukushima, the reactor stays within the safe and stable portion of its operating envelope.


10 posted on 02/08/2014 5:21:02 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: theBuckwheat
“walkaway safe”, so in the event of total loss of cooling power like at Fukushima, the reactor stays within the safe and stable portion of its operating envelope.

The total loss of cooling power at Fukushima resulted from a bad decision. Even after the coolant loop shutdown from the tsunami damage, there was still cooling power left - the shutdown reactor could have been flooded with seawater. Rather than immediately flood with seawater to prevent the meltdown, the decision was delayed because to do so would have permanently disabled the reactors. Probably the seawater flooding should have been enabled by the scram and initiated by the coolant loop shutdown, rather than subject to a fallible decision chain.

24 posted on 02/09/2014 12:00:56 AM PST by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson