The authors point is the point and it’s the critical one. I’m sure you’re the exception but as a whole the American Christian culture is a gelatinous mass of contradiction on this issue - yet we want to rail on this issue ignoring the board in our own eye.
I agree that the author’s point about divorce is entirely legitimate.
Reality is, though, it is a ridiculous jump in logic to call anal penetration by a penis marriage... just because John and Susy got divorced.
Now, the author doesn’t say that. He sounds like a traditional marriage guy, but he argues that the gay marriage folks have a point when they showcase the sorry state of divorce. He then should make a stronger case that there is no legitimacy for so-called “gay marriage” no matter what the traditional marriage divorce rate.
- yet we want to rail on this issue ignoring the board in our own eye.”
The degree to which some fail in attaining perfection has no bearing on the moral point under discussion-and yet the author goes right ahead and juxtaposes anyway. People are or can be asses...wow....big news....alert the networks.